THE SURFACE LOOKS SIMILAR

Both solutions check the boxes:

✓ Deal room capabilities
✓ Content creation tools
✓ CRM integration
✓ "AI-powered"

So why do 73% of companies switch from theirs to ours within 18 months?

THE ARCHITECTURE TELLS THE TRUTH

Path A: Built for 2019

Requires 4-6 separate tools
40+ hours of manual configuration
Data lives in 5 different places
Originally built for document sharing
Retrofitted for sales workflows

Path B: Built for 2025

Single unified platform
5-minute setup
One source of truth
Purpose-built for sales teams
Architecture assumes modern selling

One saves $20k upfront. The other saves $200k/year.

WHAT HAPPENS IN MONTH 3

With Option A:

"Why is this taking so long?"
"We need another tool for screen recording"
"The team isn't adopting it"
Hidden cost: $45k in workarounds

With Option B:

"We're already seeing ROI"
"Everything just works together"
"The team loves the AI assistance"
Actual result: $85k in pipeline acceleration

Real quote from TechFlow Solutions: "We started with [Competitor]. Spent 6 months trying to make it work. Switched to Distribute and recovered our entire year in 90 days. Our win rates jumped 34%."

THE DECISION FRAMEWORK 💡

What You're Optimizing For	Legacy Approach	Modern Platform
Lowest sticker price	✓
Fastest time to value		✓
Scalability past 100 users		✓
Total cost over 24 months		✓
Team actually using it		✓
Sleeping well at night		✓

THE QUESTION THAT MATTERS

Not: "Which vendor has the best features?"

But: "Which architecture matches where we're going?"

If you're solving yesterday's problem → Legacy approach works fine.

If you're building tomorrow's competitive advantage → You already know.

P.S. - Happy to introduce you to 3 companies who evaluated both. They'll tell you what we can't.